Mathura
His opposition to Anirudhacharya Maharaj’s statement continues. Now this matter has reached the court. Women advocates have filed a petition in the ACJM First Court in this case. Earlier, women lawyers also gave a complaint letter to SSP Mathura. On which the SSP had assured to take action on Anirudhacharya. But till now no action is taken, the advocates have reached the shelter of the court. In this petition filed against Anirudhacharya, he has prayed to the court to file a case against Anirudhacharya in the relevant sections of BNS.
Let us know that on July 26, angry with the statement of Anirudhacharya Maharaj, women lawyers burnt their effigy in the court premises. The Bar Association had decided to file a case against Maharaj. At present, the protest on the legal and social front regarding his statement has intensified.
Also read: ‘Rakhi Jihad’ or only ‘political stunt’! Sadhvi Prachi’s controversial statement about the moon-stars Rakhi, know what while connecting Islam?
Please tell that Anirudhacharya Maharaj made some such comments on 25 -year -old women. Who gave rise to controversy. He had said that by the age of 25, girls are completely mature, due to which the possibility of pre-milestone relationship increases by getting married late. Due to this statement, he is facing a lot of criticism.
